tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11387477.post713017543994922784..comments2008-02-10T12:06:46.873-05:00Brian Vermettehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04729977514524441803noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11387477.post-30937039272490994412008-02-10T12:06:00.000-05:002008-02-10T12:06:00.000-05:00Hi revjim,<BR/>Thankd for the comments, one thing that struck me was the Sportsmen series, I had forgotten about that, that could be key in the new identity.Racedrivenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04729977514524441803noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11387477.post-42850313221920032152008-02-10T04:21:00.000-05:002008-02-10T04:21:00.000-05:00Wow, you really have thought this out. I like most of your ideas, and having a completely different kind of car is one of the best ideas. <BR/>Yes, if they called it the Sportsman Series, that would take care of the name identity problem. That's what it was until 1982.<BR/>I agree, that they should let Cup regulars race, because it does help develop the drivers' skills. <BR/>It seems that they are tending to go more towards the road courses. Having three road races on the schedule does differentiate the series from the Cup a little. <BR/>I really like your ideas. I wonder if NASCAR will listen?RevJimhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10197393011402035296noreply@blogger.com